--- url: 'https://tx.giglio-bradylist.com/prosecutor-misconduct-no-1705880337-1201813389' title: 'Prosecutor Misconduct No. 1705880337 - 1201813389' author: name: Anonymous date: '2024-01-19T02:52:26+00:00' updated: '2024-01-21T23:38:57+00:00' type: prosecutor_misconduct summary: 'The Hampden County District Attorney Brady List contains records of Dana Parsons, including: Prosecutor Misconduct No. 1705880337 - 1201813389. The List includes additional records like: police misconduct, public complaints, decertification, do-not-call (Giglio List) status, and more...' tags: - 'Failure to Disclose Brady/Giglio Material' - Overcharging - 'Witness Tampering' published: true --- ## [Prosecutor Misconduct No. 1705880337 - 1201813389](/prosecutor-misconduct-no-1705880337-1201813389) [](https://ice.giglio-bradylist.com/individual/dana-%20parsons)Dana Parsons **[Hampden County District Attorney](/group/20247)** 50 State Street Springfield, Massachusetts 01103 [(413) 747-1000](tel:%28413%29747-1000) [https://hampdenda.c…](https://hampdenda.com/) [](/group/20247) ## Date of Offense June 26, 2023 ## Offense(s) [Failure to Disclose Brady/Giglio Material](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/failure-disclose-bradygiglio-material) [Overcharging](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty/overcharging) [Witness Tampering](/prosecutor-complaint-categories/duty-adjacent/witness-tampering) ## Reporting Authority This complaint has been forwarded to the [Massachusetts Bar Association](/group/23352) ## Statement From the beginning of this case the witness words have been misrepresented. From the victim witness advocate Tina Simmons, her supervisor Tyler St Laurence , the original prosecutor from the district court case Megan tessier, and the current prosecutor Dana Parsons. Both prosecutors have never spoken with the alleged victim and on multiple hearing misquoted her and the statements obtained by the officers. When attorney parsons took over the case and indicted it to superior she left out that the alleged victim invoked her fifth amendment right. With holding crucial information needed to make a no bias determination. In the beginning of all this they kept hinting to the alleged victim about rape in which she said any sex had was consensual. So they ultimately dropped it. In the indictment kidnapping was added to the charges but at no time was the alleged victim questioned about feeling kidnapped or forced to stay there. Mr LaPorte has all documents and evidence needed.